Ash for Leader...

Ash wrote:dodm was poorly managed and there is no denying that. if the next set is 3 weeks, that should be the end of this week right?

no submission topic? no progress on theme? anything?

you say you don't know where your authority starts or ends - well that's the same for me. I was neutral on the whole theme idea. Right now the feedback is mixed. Some want a theme, some want only part of the set a theme, some want no restriction at all. If dylan (who suggested it in the first place) said "Hey Seattleite/Leo/Snowy, we've reached a concensus on the theme idea", then sure, we'll do something.


I post submission topics the day of. That's what Leo did on DODM, and you did on WWIII.

i don't like this idea and i've made that fairly clear everytime it has been discussed, but at least i have attempted to manage it, but one of the points in my argument over it has been that if you are going to bring up an idea and enforce it over other opinions, you had at better at least try and make it work - the delays over the archetypes and original set did little to support that.

I don't mind if you want to impose your own system, but we should get a vote or something if people don't like this one / if they would prefer yours.


one of my main problems with being a co-leader is that i don't know where my authority starts or ends. people don't mind when i fix up errata's and similar small things, but when it comes anything else, i'm in the dark and can only suggest things and hope it has enough backing to see it through - something i thought did happen, though your persistence in this set idea of yours pushed anything i had to the side. which i must say i'm fairly displeased about.

same as above

but do you like my poster, i think it's pretty cool myself o:

a little overwhelming for just some scheduling ideas

Ash wrote:
banlist gets updated whenever someone feels like it - another thing i have a problem with, a set time for changes will be easier for people to keep track of, since i know people have not realised the banlist has changed and ran illegal copies of cards without knowing.

this is exactly my argument, if everything is kept on a schedule that everyone is aware of, there is no more problems with "when is the next set", "when are errata's being done", "when does the banlist get updated". however, the main focal point of a schedule would have to be around a set, having previous cards edited or listed while submissions are taking place makes it harder to develop cards since it's harder to gauge how they will affect the card pool. and the way sets have been, not just now, but since i've been here, it is difficult to build a schedule since sets would often disrupt them due to their spontaneous nature.

The new set system doesn't stop you from putting in ban list or errata suggestions.

you'll want to pester leo for booster pack cards, since he's running it all of mse, which i don't have.

Kyle Jennifer S. wrote:AS A LEMMING MYSELF, having somebody appointed in charge of like, decision things, I wouldn't mind. General Consensus is nice, but having a person be THE BAWSS usually helps convey "who is in charge of doing that and makes sure things don't turn into shitfits" to new people.