Missing the Timing/Priority
4 posters
Page 1 of 1
Priority and Missing the Timing Y/N
Missing the Timing/Priority
What do you guys think of Priority and Missing the timing, should we implement it in the CCG, or keep it the same as the TCG. I know that someone asked this before, and the consensus's decision, but it seems that in practice, it doesn't really implemented.
maybe someone can help me to create a poll, otherwise we'll vote it in the old fashioned way.
maybe someone can help me to create a poll, otherwise we'll vote it in the old fashioned way.
EMSOUP- Posts : 1028
Join date : 2012-08-31
Age : 37
Location : Bandung, Indonesia
Re: Missing the Timing/Priority
I say we keep gameplay the same as TCG
DIGITAL- Posts : 1067
Join date : 2011-03-18
Re: Missing the Timing/Priority
Agree, I guess we can follow the same formula
When... You can... = Missing timing
If.... You can.... = Not missing timing
When... You can... = Missing timing
If.... You can.... = Not missing timing
Re: Missing the Timing/Priority
except not everyone seems to be aware of times when they do actually miss the timing. or make their cards lazily and to the point they all the miss the timing through wording.
removing the missing the timing clause allows card makers a safety net for their cards to be used as intended and means we wont have to go on a mass errata spree to drag cards into functioning in their correct manner.
it's also less of a bother in terms of rulings of course. the missing the timing rules in the tcg/ocg are a complete joke anyway and the way they're handled is equally the same.
i honestly think that a card should work as intended on the card, and not by some half-arsed poorly worked ruling made by a frankly incompetent company. who cares if it's chain link 2? the card should do what it says regardless.
priority can probably go, i don't care much either way.
removing the missing the timing clause allows card makers a safety net for their cards to be used as intended and means we wont have to go on a mass errata spree to drag cards into functioning in their correct manner.
it's also less of a bother in terms of rulings of course. the missing the timing rules in the tcg/ocg are a complete joke anyway and the way they're handled is equally the same.
i honestly think that a card should work as intended on the card, and not by some half-arsed poorly worked ruling made by a frankly incompetent company. who cares if it's chain link 2? the card should do what it says regardless.
priority can probably go, i don't care much either way.
Ash- Posts : 1484
Join date : 2010-12-10
Age : 30
Location : Hull, England
Re: Missing the Timing/Priority
added poll
Ash- Posts : 1484
Join date : 2010-12-10
Age : 30
Location : Hull, England
Re: Missing the Timing/Priority
thanks ash
EMSOUP- Posts : 1028
Join date : 2012-08-31
Age : 37
Location : Bandung, Indonesia
Re: Missing the Timing/Priority
Very true. Okay then. Maybe then if it's our intention to enforce the "missing the timing" on a card, we could create some special wording? Like:
"When this card is sent to the Graveyard, at that exact time, you can Special Summon 1 Monster from your Hand."
Then, there's no way someone could unwittingly screw it up.
"When this card is sent to the Graveyard, at that exact time, you can Special Summon 1 Monster from your Hand."
Then, there's no way someone could unwittingly screw it up.
Re: Missing the Timing/Priority
why would we deliberately want a card to miss the timing anyway? still, it's a good idea.
Anyway, should a thread be made about the different rulings/terminologies/card grammars between TCG and LCCG?
Anyway, should a thread be made about the different rulings/terminologies/card grammars between TCG and LCCG?
EMSOUP- Posts : 1028
Join date : 2012-08-31
Age : 37
Location : Bandung, Indonesia
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
|
|